COMMENTS ON THE PRECEDING LETTER

Comments on the letter of P.Sabatier

editor, and my reply is appended below. The editor of Applicable Analysis did not send me Sabatier's letter, so I was not able to reply to this letter earlier. In his letter Sabatier writes that my statement " The Newton-Sabatier (NS) method for inverting the fixed-energy phase shifts for a potential is fundamentally wrong " is erroneous. In [2] my statement is proved. It is explained in [2] th...

The Elephant Will Kick the Donkey: An Attitudinal Analysis of Online Comments on the GOP Letter to the Iranian Supreme Leader

With the growth in sociality and interaction around touching national and international topics, news sites are increasingly becoming places for communities to discuss and address issues spurred by news articles. Proponents of cyberspace promise that online discourse will increase political participation and pave the road for a democratic utopia (Papacharissi, 2004). Comment writers, according t...

Response to T10 Letter Ballot Comments on Srp

Subject: Response to T10 Letter Ballot comments on SPC-3

r0 All comments from T10/04-327r1 converted to comments resolution format. No resolution attempted for any comments. r1 Resolved editorial 'theme' comments (i.e., comments where a single change like "red should be blue" is requested in multiple comments) that do not significantly affect the pagination of the main body of the document. Most notable among the 'theme' comments were those related t...

A letter from Morris Halle Comments on Luigi Burzio

I write to comment on a number of issues raised in the recent paper by Luigi Burzio “The Rise of Optimality Theory” (Glot International 6). Burzio begins his paper by recalling that in his classes of ca. 1976 Chomsky “would argue that writing a rule does not constitute a solution to a problem, but merely a statement of it.” He finds this position incompatible with Chomsky’s more recent statemen...